How to stop counterfeit goods at the EU border: customs enforcement

20 juli 2026

Effective enforcement against counterfeit and pirated goods requires a clear understanding of the legal tools available under EU law

Joost Becker
Joost Becker
Lawyer - Partner
Jeroen Lubbers
Jeroen Lubbers
Advocaat - Senior
In this article

Why do counterfeit goods pose a risk to your business?

From luxury products and consumer electronics to pharmaceuticals and industrial components, intellectual property (IP) infringement can damage brand value, reduce consumer trust, and create serious health and safety risks.

Regulation (EU) 608/2013 concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights lays down measures to take into detention goods by which intellectual property rights are infringed. Intellectual property rights (“IP rights”) means trade marks, designs, copyrights, patents, geographical indications, plant variety rights, topographies of semiconductor products.

How does customs seizure of counterfeit goods work in the EU?

As one of the primary EU member states in the import and export of goods, the Netherlands has implemented customs controls for IP rights. Under the regulation, customs can seize goods that are suspected of infringing these IP rights. The EU system provides for a notification of the IP rights holders filed at customs beforehand.

Customs enforcement is particularly effective because it enables authorities to intervene before products enter commercial circulation. Instead of requiring multiple legal actions after goods have reached retailers and consumers, enforcement can occur directly at the border.

Moreover, next to customs seizures at the border and liaising with customs, criminal complaints may also be filed at the police for illegal trade.

How do you file an application for action with customs?

IP rights holders may submit an application to protect IP rights, requesting Member States' customs authorities to take action (so-called “application for action”). Next to IP rights holders, persons and entities entitled to initiate proceedings may also submit an application (once mandated). In principle, customs authorities charge no administrative costs for filing such notices.

For reasons of effectiveness, applicants are encouraged to provide detailed information such as:

  • Images of authentic products;
  • Product identification data;
  • Information on authorized distributors;
  • Risk indicators and supply-chain information;
  • Etc.

Where appropriate, IP rights holders and their representatives should use the electronic applications for action to customs.

When can customs destroy counterfeit goods without a court order?

One of the regulation’s most powerful tools is the destruction procedure. When customs detain goods suspected of infringing IP rights, the goods may be destroyed. Specifically, destruction may proceed without a court order where:

  1. the rights holder confirms infringement and agrees to destruction;
  2. the declarant or holder of the goods agrees or fails to object within the prescribed period

This system allows effective pre-litigation enforcement of IP-rights, usually also by way of parallel cease-and-desist letters to the parties involved in the infringement of IP rights in reaching settlements quickly. In doing so these anti-counterfeiting measures help in fighting copies, dupes and pirated goods.

Can counterfeit goods be recycled instead of destroyed?

Recent initiatives show that effective protection of IP rights and sustainability may go hand-in-hand, where recycling counterfeit goods is becoming an increasingly important alternative to destroying goods that infringe IP rights. As examples from customs authorities and IP rights holders show, recycling initiatives have been successfully implemented, taking into account legal, logistical, and possible safety concerns associated with handling counterfeit materials.

What are the first steps towards a customs enforcement strategy?

The Anti-counterfeiting regulation represents a cornerstone of the EU’s strategy against counterfeiting and piracy. By empowering customs authorities to intervene at the border, putting in place the notification procedure and simplifying destruction procedures, the regulation provides rights holders with a practical and effective enforcement mechanism.

For companies whose value depends on brands, technology, designs, or copyrighted works, maintaining an active customs enforcement strategy under Regulation 608/2013 remains one of the most effective ways to protect intellectual property within the European Union.

Related

New CJEU judgment: “algorithmic control” puts online service providers’ liability exemption at risk

On 16 June 2026, European Court of Justice delivered a landmark ruling under the E-Commerce directive (2000/31/EC). The Court confirms that algorithmic control...

Recent IP developments every business should know about

Intellectual property law is moving fast. Recent developments, such as landmark EU court rulings on copyright and design protection, new data on IP ownership,...

Design law: the legal requirements for protection of EU designs

At the end of 2025, the European Court of Justice presented a new judgment concerning the protection of designs, which is particularly important for rights...

European Court of Justice rules on the protection of product design

The Court of Justice issued a groundbreaking judgement on the question product design can be protected by copyright.

Green trademarks in the EU: legal protection, distinctiveness, and sustainability

In recent years, sustainability has become an increasingly significant factor in corporate identity and branding strategies. Environmental concerns and...
Monitoring in Defence and Security

Defence & Security: Key considerations around increased investment in cybersecurity

A Europe-wide decision has recently been made to invest up to 5% of GDP in defence and related sectors. This means that significant funds will gradually be...
No posts found